Main Media English

Get Latest News, India News, World News at Main Media English

Support Us

SC upholds validity of key provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

IANS logo Reported By IANS |
Published On :

New Delhi, Nov 8 (IANS) The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to read down several key provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) pertaining to the personal guarantors’ Insolvency Resolution Process.

A bench, headed by CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, upheld the constitutionality of the impugned provisions saying that the IBC does not suffer from vices of arbitrariness.

Also Read Story

Empty chairs, forced attendance allegations cast shadow on INDIA bloc’s Delhi rally

Nagaland’s sole LS seat to witness triangular contest in 2024 polls

Odisha Crime Branch busts racket involved in Rs 1.04 cr fraud

IPL 2024: Under-pressure Mumbai Indians hope to shine in home comfort (Preview)

IPL 2024: Sai Sudharsan, David Miller star as clinical Gujarat beat Hyderabad by seven wickets

Viksit Bharat Ambassador meet-up: India is world’s 3rd largest start-up ecosystem today, says I&B Minister Anurag Thakur

Amit Shah chairs meeting of Lok Sabha core committees in Jaipur, holds roadshow in Sikar

IPL 2024: Ishant Sharma back as Delhi Capitals win toss, elect to bat against CSK

Viksit Bharat Ambassador Jaipur meet-up: Participants heap praise on the initiative

It held that it could not “rewrite” legislation by reading into an opportunity of hearing to be given to the personal guarantors.

The petitioners challenged several provisions of the Code saying that they not only failed to uphold the principles of natural justice but also infringed upon fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 21, 14, and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution.

Further, the petitioners had told the apex court that IBC provisions obstruct the right to livelihood and life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution by imposing moratoriums and insolvency proceedings without a fair opportunity to be heard.

It was contended that Sections 95(1), 96(1), 97(5), 99(1), 99(2), 99(4), 99(5), 99(6), and 100 of the IBC failed to uphold the principles of natural justice and due process was absent in the application of these provisions.

Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing the petitioners, had submitted that Section 95 which deals with the existence of debt, lacked a formal hearing and initiated the appointment of a Resolution Professional (RP) without allowing the purported guarantor to present their case.

Singhvi also raised concerns over “intrusive questions” by RPs and threats to individual privacy.

On the other hand, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing on behalf of the Centre and the SBI, had submitted before the court that a time-bound resolution of insolvency constitutes the heart and soul of the IBC.

He argued that a moratorium under Section 96 unlike Section 14 is to the benefit of the guarantor or the debtor.

The Parliament introduced the IBC in 2016 to fast-track the resolution of insolvencies and tackle the piling of bad loan cases in the country that had hugely impacted the banking system. The Code intends to protect the interests of small investors and make the process of doing business less cumbersome. When a default in repayment occurs, creditors gain control over the debtor’s assets and must make decisions to resolve insolvency. Companies have to complete the entire insolvency exercise within 180 days under the code. However, the deadline may be extended if the creditors do not raise objections to the extension. Under the provisions, the debtor and creditor both can start recovery proceedings against each other.



(This report is auto-generated from IANS news service. 'Main Media' holds no responsibility for its content.)

Get involved in bringing the ground realities of Seemanchal. Click the "Support Us" button to join our membership.

Support Us

Related News

Pawar vs Pawar: A fight for supremacy in Baramati

Rebel Wilson opens up on weight loss journey, says she’s an emotional eater

Shraddha Kapoor asks fans how they wasted 1st quarter of 2024

PM Modi virtually interacts with party workers in Varanasi

AIADMK will ally again with BJP after LS elections, says Chidambaram

PE-VC investments fall by 8 per cent to $6.2 billion in Q1

Cut! Mark Ronson’s role in Amy Winehouse biopic gets axed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *