Main Media English

Get Latest News, India News, World News at Main Media English

Support Us

SC to impose costs on states not responding on plea to declare minorities at state/district level

IANS logo Reported By IANS |
Published On :

New Delhi, Jan 12 (IANS) The Supreme Court on Friday said that it will impose costs on state governments for not submitting their response to the Central government on the issue of identification of minorities at the state or district level.

A bench of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta said that the state government, if it fails to file an affidavit before the apex court or furnish data or comments to the Centre within a period of six weeks, will have to pay a cost of Rs 10,000.

Also Read Story

Empty chairs, forced attendance allegations cast shadow on INDIA bloc’s Delhi rally

Nagaland’s sole LS seat to witness triangular contest in 2024 polls

Odisha Crime Branch busts racket involved in Rs 1.04 cr fraud

IPL 2024: Under-pressure Mumbai Indians hope to shine in home comfort (Preview)

IPL 2024: Sai Sudharsan, David Miller star as clinical Gujarat beat Hyderabad by seven wickets

Viksit Bharat Ambassador meet-up: India is world’s 3rd largest start-up ecosystem today, says I&B Minister Anurag Thakur

Amit Shah chairs meeting of Lok Sabha core committees in Jaipur, holds roadshow in Sikar

IPL 2024: Ishant Sharma back as Delhi Capitals win toss, elect to bat against CSK

Viksit Bharat Ambassador Jaipur meet-up: Participants heap praise on the initiative

The bench said that it will take up the issue of identification of minorities in April.


It also asked the Union Ministry of Minority Affairs to file an updated status report at least two weeks prior to the next date of listing.

The batch of pleas challenge a provision of the National Commission for Minorities (NCM) Act declaring Muslims, Christians, Buddhists, Parsis, Sikhs and Jains as minorities at the national level and seek a direction to the Centre to define “minority” and lay down the guidelines for the identification of minorities at the district level and state-wise status.

Earlier, the top court had remarked that religious and linguistic minority status has to be decided state wise, observing that it is difficult to entertain a prayer to identify religious and linguistic minorities at the district level.

In the case of TMA Pai and others vs State of Karnataka (2002), the Supreme Court had held that minorities must be identified at the state-level.

–IANS

pds/vd

(This report is auto-generated from IANS news service. 'Main Media' holds no responsibility for its content.)

Get involved in bringing the ground realities of Seemanchal. Click the "Support Us" button to join our membership.

Support Us

Related News

Pawar vs Pawar: A fight for supremacy in Baramati

Rebel Wilson opens up on weight loss journey, says she’s an emotional eater

Shraddha Kapoor asks fans how they wasted 1st quarter of 2024

PM Modi virtually interacts with party workers in Varanasi

AIADMK will ally again with BJP after LS elections, says Chidambaram

PE-VC investments fall by 8 per cent to $6.2 billion in Q1

Cut! Mark Ronson’s role in Amy Winehouse biopic gets axed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *